Intellectual Property

5 Mistakes Multinationals Make With Pakistan Trademarks

Published 2026-08-02 · Irfan Mir Halepota & Associates
Quick answer

The same five trademark mistakes recur across multinational companies entering Pakistan — most stemming from treating Pakistan as an afterthought in a global filing programme rather than its own jurisdiction with its own risks.

At a glance: 5 Mistakes Multinationals Make With Pakistan Trademarks A T A G L A N C E The same five trademark mistakes recur across multinational companies enteringPakistan — most stemming from treating Pakistan as an afterthought in a global filingprogramme rather than its own jurisdiction with its own risks. IN THIS GUIDE 1. Filing after market entry, not before 2. Assuming a home registration provides automatic protection 3. Under-scoping the classes filed 4. Weak IP clauses in local distribution agreements 5. No local agent identified until a problem arrives Irfan Mir Halepota & Associates · Advocates, Karachi

These five recur often enough, across enough multinational clients, that they're worth naming directly rather than folding into general advice.

1. Filing after market entry, not before

A brand that starts trading, advertising, or distributing in Pakistan before a trademark application is on file gives opportunistic local filers a window to register first — trademark rights in Pakistan generally run from the filing date, not from when the brand actually started operating. Unwinding a bad-faith prior filing is possible but considerably more expensive than filing early would have been.

2. Assuming a home registration provides automatic protection

A US, EU or UK trademark registration protects the brand in those jurisdictions — it does not, by itself, create rights in Pakistan. Companies sometimes discover this only when a local party has already registered a similar or identical mark, at which point contesting it is a formal opposition or cancellation proceeding rather than a simple correction.

3. Under-scoping the classes filed

Filing only in the class covering the current product line, without anticipating related goods or services the brand is likely to extend into, means a later expansion can run into a class gap — and sometimes into a third party who has since filed in the class that was left uncovered.

4. Weak IP clauses in local distribution agreements

Distribution and licensing agreements adapted from a template built for a different jurisdiction often don't clearly address what happens to goodwill, marketing materials, or the Pakistani trademark filing itself if the distributor relationship ends — a gap that surfaces at exactly the worst moment, when the relationship is already ending on bad terms.

5. No local agent identified until a problem arrives

Responding to an examination objection, a provisional refusal on a Madrid designation, or an opposition all run on statutory deadlines. A multinational that only starts looking for Pakistani counsel after a deadline has already started running loses time it didn't need to lose — we recommend identifying local counsel as part of the initial filing plan, not as a reaction to the first problem.

This article is general information about Pakistani law and procedure, not legal advice for any specific matter. If this touches on something you're currently facing, get in touch and we'll advise on your facts directly.

More insights