Enforcing a Foreign Arbitral Award in Pakistan
Pakistan recognises foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention — but enforcement still requires navigating a specific court process.
Winning an international arbitration is only half the outcome — the award still needs to be enforced, and Pakistan's route for doing that runs through the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, which implements the New York Convention.
What the process looks like
The award-holder applies to the High Court for recognition and enforcement, at which point the award is generally treated much like a decree of the court, subject to specific, limited grounds on which enforcement can be resisted.
The limited grounds for refusal
These are narrow by design — incapacity of a party, invalid arbitration agreement, improper notice, the award exceeding the scope of the arbitration agreement, or conflict with Pakistani public policy, among others set out in the Convention. Courts are not meant to re-examine the merits of the underlying dispute.
Why "public policy" objections rarely succeed
Parties resisting enforcement frequently invoke public policy, but Pakistani courts have generally applied this ground narrowly, consistent with the pro-enforcement approach the New York Convention is built around — a broad public policy objection is not the same as simply disagreeing with the outcome.
Practical steps for award-holders
Having the arbitration agreement, the award, and their translations (where relevant) properly authenticated before filing avoids procedural objections that can otherwise delay enforcement unnecessarily.
This article is general information about Pakistani law and procedure, not legal advice for any specific matter. If this touches on something you're currently facing, get in touch and we'll advise on your facts directly.